You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Relation between abnormal synergy and gait in patients after stroke
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, September 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1743-0003-11-141 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kaoru Sakuma, Koji Ohata, Keisuke Izumi, Yu Shiotsuka, Tadashi Yasui, Satoko Ibuki, Noriaki Ichihashi |
| Abstract |
The abnormal synergy seen in patients after stroke is considered to limit the ability of these patients. However, in the lower extremity, antigravity torque generation rather than precise movement is needed for functions such as sit-to-stand movement and gait. Therefore, the ability to generate torque may be important either as a primary movement or as an abnormal synergy. We attempted to quantify the torque generation in the lower limb, selectively and as an abnormal synergy, and its relation with gait. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 97 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Czechia | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 96 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 17 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 9% |
| Researcher | 8 | 8% |
| Other | 6 | 6% |
| Other | 23 | 24% |
| Unknown | 21 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 19 | 20% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 16 | 16% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 15 | 15% |
| Neuroscience | 11 | 11% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 11 | 11% |
| Unknown | 22 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 January 2021.
All research outputs
#17,302,400
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
#935
of 1,414 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#157,810
of 263,148 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
#11
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,414 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 263,148 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.