↓ Skip to main content

Comparison of cardiovascular co-morbidities and CPAP use in patients with positional and non-positional mild obstructive sleep apnea

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Pulmonary Medicine, September 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (62nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
65 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Comparison of cardiovascular co-morbidities and CPAP use in patients with positional and non-positional mild obstructive sleep apnea
Published in
BMC Pulmonary Medicine, September 2014
DOI 10.1186/1471-2466-14-153
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yi-Chih Huang, Chun-Yao Lin, Chou-Chin Lan, Yao-Kuang Wu, Chor-Shen Lim, Chun-Yao Huang, Hsuan-Li Huang, Kuan-Hung Yeh, Yu-Chih Liu, Mei-Chen Yang

Abstract

This retrospective cohort study aimed to determine if there are differences in cardiovascular co-morbidities, blood pressure (BP) and continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) use between patients with positional-dependent and nonpositional-dependent obstructive sleep apnea (OSA).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 65 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 65 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 12 18%
Student > Postgraduate 6 9%
Student > Master 6 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 8%
Researcher 5 8%
Other 11 17%
Unknown 20 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 20 31%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 5%
Neuroscience 3 5%
Engineering 2 3%
Other 3 5%
Unknown 25 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 January 2017.
All research outputs
#15,309,642
of 25,067,172 outputs
Outputs from BMC Pulmonary Medicine
#944
of 2,219 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#131,339
of 258,678 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Pulmonary Medicine
#12
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,067,172 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,219 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 258,678 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.