You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Exploring mentorship as a strategy to build capacity for knowledge translation research and practice: a scoping systematic review
|
---|---|
Published in |
Implementation Science, September 2014
|
DOI | 10.1186/s13012-014-0122-z |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Anna R Gagliardi, Fiona Webster, Laure Perrier, Mary Bell, Sharon Straus |
Abstract |
Knowledge translation (KT) supports use of evidence in healthcare decision making but is not widely practiced. Mentoring is a promising means of developing KT capacity. The purpose of this scoping systematic review was to identify essential components of mentoring that could be adapted for KT mentorship. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 25 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Canada | 6 | 24% |
United Kingdom | 5 | 20% |
Australia | 2 | 8% |
United States | 2 | 8% |
Colombia | 1 | 4% |
South Africa | 1 | 4% |
Chile | 1 | 4% |
Unknown | 7 | 28% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 13 | 52% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 20% |
Scientists | 4 | 16% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 12% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 178 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 3 | 2% |
Sierra Leone | 1 | <1% |
Canada | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 173 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 31 | 17% |
Researcher | 24 | 13% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 22 | 12% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 12 | 7% |
Other | 9 | 5% |
Other | 28 | 16% |
Unknown | 52 | 29% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 33 | 19% |
Social Sciences | 28 | 16% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 28 | 16% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 6 | 3% |
Psychology | 5 | 3% |
Other | 16 | 9% |
Unknown | 62 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 March 2015.
All research outputs
#2,290,797
of 25,311,095 outputs
Outputs from Implementation Science
#464
of 1,798 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,449
of 259,404 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Implementation Science
#10
of 61 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,311,095 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,798 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 259,404 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 61 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.