↓ Skip to main content

Successful use of pazopanib for treatment of refractory metastatic hemangiopericytoma

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Sarcoma Research, September 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
32 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
40 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Successful use of pazopanib for treatment of refractory metastatic hemangiopericytoma
Published in
Clinical Sarcoma Research, September 2014
DOI 10.1186/2045-3329-4-13
Pubmed ID
Authors

Su Jin Lee, Seung Tae Kim, Se Hoon Park, Yoon La Choi, Jae Berm Park, Sung-Joo Kim, Jeeyun Lee

Abstract

Hemangiopericytoma is a rare disease entity of soft-tissue sarcoma (STS) that can be cured with surgical resection. In cases of inoperable recurrence or metastasis, palliative chemotherapy is indicated, though there is currently no approved chemotherapy regimen. Therefore new treatment regimens are needed. We describe three cases of metastatic hemangiopericytoma. In the first case, five lines of chemotherapeutic agents were used unsuccessfully in a patient with a 12-year history of metastatic hemangiopericytoma. After one cycle of pazopanib therapy, however, chest radiography showed a decrease in tumor volume of more than 30%. A marked decrease in FDG uptake on PET CT was also noted, and the patient is now on her 5(th) month of pazopanib therapy. The second case is a patient with a brain hemangiopericytoma with multiple liver, lung, and bone metastases. Pazopanib induced radiologic stabilization of metastatic disease over the course of 8 months. The third case is a patient with a retroperitoneal hemangiopericytoma with pleural and peri-renal metastases. For more than 8 months, he has exhibited stable disease with pazopanib treatment. Pazopanib may be useful for treatment of metastatic hemangiopericytoma, though further studies are needed to confirm the efficacy of this medication and to investigate its molecular mechanism of action.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 3%
Unknown 39 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 7 18%
Other 6 15%
Researcher 5 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 10%
Student > Master 4 10%
Other 7 18%
Unknown 7 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 23 57%
Engineering 3 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 10 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 March 2023.
All research outputs
#15,794,207
of 23,462,326 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Sarcoma Research
#57
of 103 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#148,289
of 253,822 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Sarcoma Research
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,462,326 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 103 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 253,822 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them