You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
STUB1 mutations in autosomal recessive ataxias – evidence for mutation-specific clinical heterogeneity
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases, September 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13023-014-0146-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ketil Heimdal, Monica Sanchez-Guixé, Ingvild Aukrust, Jens Bollerslev, Ove Bruland, Greg Eigner Jablonski, Anne Kjersti Erichsen, Einar Gude, Jeanette A Koht, Sigrid Erdal, Torunn Fiskerstrand, Bjørn Ivar Haukanes, Helge Boman, Lise Bjørkhaug, Chantal ME Tallaksen, Per M Knappskog, Stefan Johansson |
| Abstract |
A subset of hereditary cerebellar ataxias is inherited as autosomal recessive traits (ARCAs). Classification of recessive ataxias due to phenotypic differences in the cerebellum and cerebellar structures is constantly evolving due to new identified disease genes. Recently, reports have linked mutations in genes involved in ubiquitination (RNF216, OTUD4, STUB1) to ARCA with hypogonadism. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Israel | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 56 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
| Spain | 1 | 2% |
| United States | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 53 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 20% |
| Researcher | 8 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 13% |
| Other | 7 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 7% |
| Other | 8 | 14% |
| Unknown | 11 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 13 | 23% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 10 | 18% |
| Neuroscience | 6 | 11% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 9% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 7% |
| Other | 7 | 13% |
| Unknown | 11 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 September 2014.
All research outputs
#14,786,093
of 22,764,165 outputs
Outputs from Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
#1,694
of 2,611 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#139,090
of 252,277 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
#25
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,764,165 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,611 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.5. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 252,277 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.