↓ Skip to main content

Physiogenomic comparison of human fat loss in response to diets restrictive of carbohydrate or fat

Overview of attention for article published in Nutrition & Metabolism, February 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
46 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Physiogenomic comparison of human fat loss in response to diets restrictive of carbohydrate or fat
Published in
Nutrition & Metabolism, February 2008
DOI 10.1186/1743-7075-5-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Richard L Seip, Jeff S Volek, Andreas Windemuth, Mohan Kocherla, Maria Luz Fernandez, William J Kraemer, Gualberto Ruaño

Abstract

Genetic factors that predict responses to diet may ultimately be used to individualize dietary recommendations. We used physiogenomics to explore associations among polymorphisms in candidate genes and changes in relative body fat (Delta%BF) to low fat and low carbohydrate diets.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
Argentina 1 2%
Unknown 44 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 13 28%
Student > Bachelor 6 13%
Student > Master 6 13%
Student > Postgraduate 3 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 7%
Other 7 15%
Unknown 8 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 20%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 15%
Sports and Recreations 7 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 2%
Other 5 11%
Unknown 9 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 June 2022.
All research outputs
#2,277,091
of 22,764,165 outputs
Outputs from Nutrition & Metabolism
#258
of 945 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,106
of 156,319 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nutrition & Metabolism
#3
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,764,165 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 945 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 156,319 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.