You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Long term effect of a medical emergency team on cardiac arrests in a teaching hospital
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Care, November 2005
|
| DOI | 10.1186/cc3906 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Daryl Jones, Rinaldo Bellomo, Samantha Bates, Stephen Warrillow, Donna Goldsmith, Graeme Hart, Helen Opdam, Geoffrey Gutteridge |
| Abstract |
It is unknown whether the reported short-term reduction in cardiac arrests associated with the introduction of the medical emergency team (MET) system can be sustained. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 125 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 2% |
| Japan | 2 | 2% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 118 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 21 | 17% |
| Researcher | 20 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 17 | 14% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 11 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 7% |
| Other | 32 | 26% |
| Unknown | 15 | 12% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 83 | 66% |
| Psychology | 4 | 3% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 2% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 8 | 6% |
| Unknown | 20 | 16% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 November 2019.
All research outputs
#2,847,199
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#2,440
of 6,554 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,612
of 66,172 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#4
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,554 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 66,172 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.