The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Maternal and perinatal mortality by place of delivery in sub-Saharan Africa: a meta-analysis of population-based cohort studies
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Public Health, September 2014
|
DOI | 10.1186/1471-2458-14-1014 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Jobiba Chinkhumba, Manuela De Allegri, Adamson S Muula, Bjarne Robberstad |
Abstract |
Facility-based delivery has gained traction as a key strategy for reducing maternal and perinatal mortality in developing countries. However, robust evidence of impact of place of delivery on maternal and perinatal mortality is lacking. We aimed to estimate the risk of maternal and perinatal mortality by place of delivery in sub-Saharan Africa. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 4 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 4 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 322 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
Ethiopia | 1 | <1% |
Malawi | 1 | <1% |
India | 1 | <1% |
Rwanda | 1 | <1% |
United States | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 316 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 56 | 17% |
Researcher | 34 | 11% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 31 | 10% |
Student > Postgraduate | 29 | 9% |
Student > Bachelor | 26 | 8% |
Other | 58 | 18% |
Unknown | 88 | 27% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 87 | 27% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 59 | 18% |
Social Sciences | 21 | 7% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 11 | 3% |
Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 9 | 3% |
Other | 36 | 11% |
Unknown | 99 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 October 2016.
All research outputs
#2,158,075
of 22,764,165 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#2,422
of 14,838 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,513
of 252,576 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#41
of 264 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,764,165 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,838 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 252,576 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 264 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.