You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Integrating HIV testing into cervical cancer screening in Tanzania: an analysis of routine service delivery statistics
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Women's Health, September 2014
|
DOI | 10.1186/1472-6874-14-120 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Marya Plotkin, Giulia VR Besana, Safina Yuma, Young Mi Kim, Yusuph Kulindwa, Fatma Kabole, Enriquito Lu, Mary Rose Giattas |
Abstract |
While the lifetime risk of developing cervical cancer (CaCx) and acquiring HIV is high for women in Tanzania, most women have not tested for HIV in the past year and most have never been screened for CaCx. Good management of both diseases, which have a synergistic relationship, requires integrated screening, prevention, and treatment services. The aim of this analysis is to assess the acceptability, feasibility and effectiveness of integrating HIV testing into CaCx prevention services in Tanzania, so as to inform scale-up strategies. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 3 | 43% |
South Africa | 1 | 14% |
Tanzania, United Republic of | 1 | 14% |
Unknown | 2 | 29% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 5 | 71% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 29% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 178 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 178 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 39 | 22% |
Student > Bachelor | 21 | 12% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 11% |
Researcher | 17 | 10% |
Student > Postgraduate | 13 | 7% |
Other | 25 | 14% |
Unknown | 44 | 25% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 57 | 32% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 32 | 18% |
Social Sciences | 14 | 8% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 3% |
Psychology | 4 | 2% |
Other | 19 | 11% |
Unknown | 46 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 October 2014.
All research outputs
#6,358,223
of 22,764,165 outputs
Outputs from BMC Women's Health
#682
of 1,800 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#67,788
of 252,706 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Women's Health
#12
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,764,165 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,800 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 252,706 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.