↓ Skip to main content

Spatial and temporal epidemiology of clinical malaria in Cambodia 2004–2013

Overview of attention for article published in Malaria Journal, September 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
10 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
72 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
126 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Spatial and temporal epidemiology of clinical malaria in Cambodia 2004–2013
Published in
Malaria Journal, September 2014
DOI 10.1186/1475-2875-13-385
Pubmed ID
Authors

Richard J Maude, Chea Nguon, Po Ly, Tol Bunkea, Pengby Ngor, Sara E Canavati de la Torre, Nicholas J White, Arjen M Dondorp, Nicholas PJ Day, Lisa J White, Char Meng Chuor

Abstract

Artemisinin-resistant Plasmodium falciparum malaria has recently been identified on the Thailand-Cambodia border and more recently in parts of Thailand, Myanmar and Vietnam. There is concern that if this resistance were to spread, it would severely hamper malaria control and elimination efforts worldwide. Efforts are currently underway to intensify malaria control activities and ultimately eliminate malaria from Cambodia. To support these efforts, it is crucial to have a detailed picture of disease burden and its major determinants over time.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 126 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 2%
Vietnam 1 <1%
Burkina Faso 1 <1%
Thailand 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 120 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 30 24%
Student > Master 24 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 9%
Student > Bachelor 10 8%
Other 5 4%
Other 19 15%
Unknown 27 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 37 29%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 17 13%
Social Sciences 7 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 6%
Computer Science 4 3%
Other 22 17%
Unknown 32 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 March 2018.
All research outputs
#2,030,075
of 23,674,309 outputs
Outputs from Malaria Journal
#398
of 5,671 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,292
of 254,026 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Malaria Journal
#9
of 93 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,674,309 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,671 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 254,026 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 93 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.