You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Right ventricle free wall mechanics in metabolic syndrome without type-2 diabetes: effects of a 3-month lifestyle intervention program
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cardiovascular Diabetology, August 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12933-014-0116-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Juan Serrano-Ferrer, Guillaume Walther, Edward Crendal, Agnès Vinet, Frédéric Dutheil, Geraldine Naughton, Bruno Lesourd, Robert Chapier, Daniel Courteix, Philippe Obert |
| Abstract |
Growing evidence demonstrates subtle left ventricular myocardial dysfunction in patients with metabolic syndrome (MetS), with central obesity, glucose intolerance and inflammation emerging as important contributors. Whether these results can be translated to the right ventricle (RV) is not yet fully elucidated. Furthermore, although lifestyle intervention favorably impacts MetS components and inflammatory biomarkers, its effect on RV myocardial function remains unknown today. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Comoros | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 124 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 2% |
| Unknown | 122 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 21 | 17% |
| Researcher | 16 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 13 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 9 | 7% |
| Other | 15 | 12% |
| Unknown | 37 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 37 | 30% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 18 | 15% |
| Sports and Recreations | 6 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 2% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 10 | 8% |
| Unknown | 48 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 August 2015.
All research outputs
#13,920,619
of 22,765,347 outputs
Outputs from Cardiovascular Diabetology
#682
of 1,372 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#115,258
of 229,819 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cardiovascular Diabetology
#8
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,765,347 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,372 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.7. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 229,819 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.