↓ Skip to main content

An updated meta-analysis of the asporin gene D-repeat in knee osteoarthritis: effects of gender and ethnicity

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, October 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
18 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
An updated meta-analysis of the asporin gene D-repeat in knee osteoarthritis: effects of gender and ethnicity
Published in
Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, October 2017
DOI 10.1186/s13018-017-0647-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ruoxi Liu, Xueling Yuan, Jing Yu, Qi Quan, Haoye Meng, Cheng Wang, Aiyuan Wang, Quanyi Guo, Jiang Peng, Shibi Lu

Abstract

Knee osteoarthritis (KOA) is the most prevalent form of knee joint disease and characterized by the progressive degeneration of articular cartilage. Although pathology of KOA remains unknown, genetic factors are considered to be the major cause. Asporin is a group of biologically active components of extracellular matrix (ECM) in articular cartilage, and asporin gene (ASPN) D-repeat polymorphism was reported to be associated with KOA. Thus, our meta-analysis is aimed at investigation of the association between asporin D-repeat polymorphism and susceptibility of KOA. We gathered data from MEDLINE, Embase, OVID, and ScienceDirect to search relevant published epidemiological studies through April 2017. Compared with previous studies, our meta-analysis is the first study to investigate the association of ASPN D15, D16, and D17 alleles and KOA susceptibility by ethnic- and sex-stratified subgroup analysis. We found no significant association between D15 allele and susceptibility to KOA (OR = 1.05, 95% CI 0.95-1.17) in overall population. The same results were observed in the analysis of D16 (OR = 1.01, 95% CI 0.80-1.28) and D17 alleles (OR = 1.28, 95% CI 0.91-1.80). The ethnic- and sex-subgroup analyses did not alter the ORs. However, significant association was detected in the sensitivity analysis of D17 in overall population (OR = 1.05, 95% CI 0.95-1.17) and Asian population (OR = 1.78, 95% CI 1.02-3.11, P < 0.05). Our results indicated that D-repeat polymorphism of ASPN may not play a major role in susceptibility of KOA in ethnic- and sex-specific analysis. Because of the limitations of the present meta-analysis, firm conclusions could not be drawn based on the current evidence, and further studies are required to detect genuine role of ASPN.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 18 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 5 28%
Researcher 5 28%
Student > Postgraduate 2 11%
Other 1 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 6%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 4 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 33%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 6%
Social Sciences 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 6 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 October 2017.
All research outputs
#15,481,147
of 23,005,189 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
#662
of 1,398 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#203,176
of 324,711 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
#10
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,005,189 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,398 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 324,711 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.