You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Individual social capital and survival: a population study with 5-year follow-up
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Public Health, October 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2458-14-1025 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Linda Ejlskov, Rikke N Mortensen, Charlotte Overgaard, Line R B U Christensen, Henrik Vardinghus-Nielsen, Stella R J Kræmer, Mads Wissenberg, Steen M Hansen, Christian Torp-Pedersen, Claus D Hansen |
| Abstract |
The concept of social capital has received increasing attention as a determinant of population survival, but its significance is uncertain. We examined the importance of social capital on survival in a population study while focusing on gender differences. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 3 | 21% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 21% |
| United States | 2 | 14% |
| Myanmar | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 5 | 36% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 9 | 64% |
| Scientists | 3 | 21% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 79 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Denmark | 1 | 1% |
| Peru | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 77 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 12 | 15% |
| Researcher | 8 | 10% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 7 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 8% |
| Other | 17 | 22% |
| Unknown | 15 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 19 | 24% |
| Social Sciences | 18 | 23% |
| Psychology | 8 | 10% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 9% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 3 | 4% |
| Unknown | 19 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 April 2015.
All research outputs
#1,545,748
of 23,323,574 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#1,674
of 15,206 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,117
of 254,973 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#28
of 257 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,323,574 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,206 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 254,973 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 257 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.