↓ Skip to main content

Cognitive processing of cluster headache patients: evidence from event-related potentials

Overview of attention for article published in The Journal of Headache and Pain, October 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
20 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Cognitive processing of cluster headache patients: evidence from event-related potentials
Published in
The Journal of Headache and Pain, October 2014
DOI 10.1186/1129-2377-15-66
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rongfei Wang, Zhao Dong, Xiaoyan Chen, Ruozhuo Liu, Mingjie Zhang, Jinglong Wu, Shengyuan Yu

Abstract

The peripheral and central origins of pain in cluster headache (CH) have been a matter of much debate. The development and application of functional imaging techniques have provided more evidence supporting the hypothesis that CH is not a disorder exclusively peripheral in origin, and in fact central regions might be more important. Event-related potentials confer advantages in the functional evaluation of the cortex, but few studies thus far have employed this method in cluster headache.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 20 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 4 20%
Professor 2 10%
Student > Master 2 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 10%
Researcher 2 10%
Other 2 10%
Unknown 6 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 3 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 15%
Computer Science 1 5%
Arts and Humanities 1 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 10 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 January 2015.
All research outputs
#7,273,551
of 23,849,058 outputs
Outputs from The Journal of Headache and Pain
#665
of 1,417 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#75,544
of 255,901 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Journal of Headache and Pain
#12
of 44 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,849,058 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,417 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 255,901 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 44 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.