You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Predictors of positive and negative parenting behaviours: evidence from the ALSPAC cohort
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Pediatrics, October 2014
|
DOI | 10.1186/1471-2431-14-247 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Rachel M Thomson, Clare S Allely, David Purves, Christine Puckering, Alex McConnachie, Paul CD Johnson, Jean Golding, Christopher Gillberg, Philip Wilson |
Abstract |
This study aimed to establish the predictors of positive and negative parenting behaviours in a United Kingdom population. The majority of previous research has focused on specific risk factors and has used a variety of outcome measures. This study used a single assessment of parenting behaviours and started with a wide range of potential pre- and post-natal variables; such an approach might be used to identify families who might benefit from parenting interventions. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 5 | 63% |
United States | 1 | 13% |
Chile | 1 | 13% |
Unknown | 1 | 13% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 50% |
Members of the public | 2 | 25% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 13% |
Scientists | 1 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 125 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
New Zealand | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 124 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 20 | 16% |
Researcher | 16 | 13% |
Student > Master | 16 | 13% |
Student > Bachelor | 16 | 13% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 6% |
Other | 16 | 13% |
Unknown | 34 | 27% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Psychology | 36 | 29% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 17 | 14% |
Social Sciences | 12 | 10% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 9 | 7% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 2% |
Other | 9 | 7% |
Unknown | 39 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 December 2023.
All research outputs
#4,010,281
of 24,721,757 outputs
Outputs from BMC Pediatrics
#599
of 3,315 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,499
of 259,491 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Pediatrics
#9
of 61 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,721,757 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,315 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 259,491 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 61 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.