You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Dietary elimination of children with food protein induced gastrointestinal allergy – micronutrient adequacy with and without a hypoallergenic formula?
|
---|---|
Published in |
Clinical and Translational Allergy, October 2014
|
DOI | 10.1186/2045-7022-4-31 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Rosan Meyer, Claire De Koker, Robert Dziubak, Heather Godwin, Gloria Dominguez-Ortega, Neil Shah |
Abstract |
The cornerstone for management of Food protein-induced gastrointestinal allergy (FPGIA) is dietary exclusion; however the micronutrient intake of this population has been poorly studied. We set out to determine the dietary intake of children on an elimination diet for this food allergy and hypothesised that the type of elimination diet and the presence of a hypoallergenic formula (HF) significantly impacts on micronutrient intake. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Netherlands | 2 | 18% |
United Kingdom | 2 | 18% |
United States | 1 | 9% |
India | 1 | 9% |
Canada | 1 | 9% |
Unknown | 4 | 36% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 7 | 64% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 27% |
Scientists | 1 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 45 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 10 | 22% |
Researcher | 6 | 13% |
Student > Postgraduate | 6 | 13% |
Student > Bachelor | 5 | 11% |
Other | 3 | 7% |
Other | 8 | 18% |
Unknown | 7 | 16% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 17 | 38% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 9 | 20% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 13% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 4% |
Environmental Science | 1 | 2% |
Other | 4 | 9% |
Unknown | 6 | 13% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 October 2014.
All research outputs
#4,353,540
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Clinical and Translational Allergy
#274
of 756 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#45,809
of 266,025 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical and Translational Allergy
#3
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 756 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 266,025 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.