You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Synovial fluid and synovial membrane mesenchymal stem cells: latest discoveries and therapeutic perspectives
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Stem Cell Research & Therapy, October 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/scrt501 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Eduardo Branco de Sousa, Priscila Ladeira Casado, Vivaldo Moura Neto, Maria Eugenia Leite Duarte, Diego Pinheiro Aguiar |
| Abstract |
Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) have the ability to differentiate into osteoblasts, chondroblasts, adipocytes, and even myoblasts. Most studies have focused on finding MSCs in different parts of the body for medical treatment. Every joint structure, including bone, joint fat, articular cartilage, and synovium, potentially contains resident MSCs. Recently, a progenitor cell population has been found in synovial fluid and showed similarities with both bone marrow and synovial membrane MSCs. Synovial fluid MSCs have been studied in healthy persons and osteoarthritic patients in order to explore its potential for treatment of some orthopedic disorders. Here, we briefly review the current knowledge on synovial fluid MSCs, their origin, relation to some orthopedic diseases, and future applications. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 200 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Korea, Republic of | 1 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 196 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 33 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 30 | 15% |
| Researcher | 23 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 23 | 12% |
| Other | 13 | 7% |
| Other | 28 | 14% |
| Unknown | 50 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 40 | 20% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 31 | 16% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 26 | 13% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 11 | 6% |
| Engineering | 11 | 6% |
| Other | 25 | 13% |
| Unknown | 56 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 June 2020.
All research outputs
#3,974,421
of 22,765,347 outputs
Outputs from Stem Cell Research & Therapy
#381
of 2,415 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#44,727
of 253,927 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Stem Cell Research & Therapy
#11
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,765,347 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,415 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 253,927 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.