You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A comparison of thought and perception disorders in borderline personality disorder and schizophrenia: psychotic experiences as a reaction to impaired social functioning
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Psychiatry, October 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12888-014-0239-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Francesco Oliva, Marinella Dalmotto, Elvezio Pirfo, Pier Maria Furlan, Rocco Luigi Picci |
| Abstract |
Although previous studies suggest a high frequency of psychotic symptoms in DSM-IV Borderline Personality Disorder (BPD) there is currently no consensus on their prevalence and characteristics (type, frequency, duration, location etc.). Similarly, there are few papers addressing psychotic reactivity, the crucial aspect of BPD included in the ninth criterion for DSM-IV BPD, which remained unchanged in DSM-IV-TR and DSM-5. The purposes of the present study were to compare thought and perception disorders in patients with DSM-IV BPD and schizophrenia (SC), investigating their relationship with social functioning. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 101 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 100 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 23 | 23% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 18% |
| Researcher | 15 | 15% |
| Other | 8 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 7% |
| Other | 16 | 16% |
| Unknown | 14 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 51 | 50% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 15 | 15% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 3% |
| Arts and Humanities | 2 | 2% |
| Neuroscience | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 8 | 8% |
| Unknown | 20 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 May 2015.
All research outputs
#14,262,606
of 23,301,510 outputs
Outputs from BMC Psychiatry
#3,049
of 4,808 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#129,261
of 255,288 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Psychiatry
#31
of 59 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,301,510 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,808 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.4. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 255,288 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 59 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.