You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Pharmacy refill adherence outperforms self-reported methods in predicting HIV therapy outcome in resource-limited settings
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Public Health, October 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2458-14-1035 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Raphael Z Sangeda, Fausta Mosha, Mattia Prosperi, Said Aboud, Jurgen Vercauteren, Ricardo J Camacho, Eligius F Lyamuya, Eric Van Wijngaerden, Anne-Mieke Vandamme |
| Abstract |
Optimal adherence to antiretroviral therapy is critical to prevent HIV drug resistance (HIVDR) epidemic. The objective of the study was to investigate the best performing adherence assessment method for predicting virological failure in resource-limited settings (RLS). |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 198 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Tanzania, United Republic of | 2 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Belgium | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 193 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 41 | 21% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 31 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 17 | 9% |
| Researcher | 15 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 13 | 7% |
| Other | 39 | 20% |
| Unknown | 42 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 57 | 29% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 21 | 11% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 19 | 10% |
| Social Sciences | 15 | 8% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 4% |
| Other | 30 | 15% |
| Unknown | 48 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 January 2015.
All research outputs
#14,786,597
of 22,765,347 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#10,878
of 14,838 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#140,137
of 254,034 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#195
of 263 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,765,347 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,838 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 254,034 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 263 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.