You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Ileocolonic anastomosis after right hemicolectomy for colon cancer: functional end-to-end or end-to-side?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
World Journal of Surgical Oncology, October 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1477-7819-12-306 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Zheng Liu, Guiyu Wang, Ming Yang, Yinggang Chen, Dazhuang Miao, Shan Muhammad, Xishan Wang |
| Abstract |
The purpose of this study was to compare short-term clinical outcomes of ileocolonic functional end-to-end anastomosis (FEEA) and end-to-side anastomosis (ESA) following resection of the right colon for cancer. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 40% |
| Germany | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 2 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 40% |
| Scientists | 2 | 40% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 38 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 38 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 21% |
| Researcher | 5 | 13% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 13% |
| Other | 3 | 8% |
| Other | 5 | 13% |
| Unknown | 7 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 26 | 68% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 5% |
| Psychology | 1 | 3% |
| Engineering | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 8 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 May 2018.
All research outputs
#12,843,783
of 22,765,347 outputs
Outputs from World Journal of Surgical Oncology
#320
of 2,042 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#114,553
of 254,867 outputs
Outputs of similar age from World Journal of Surgical Oncology
#8
of 73 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,765,347 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,042 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 254,867 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 73 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.