↓ Skip to main content

Hyperoxemia – too much of a good thing?

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Care, October 2014
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
31 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Hyperoxemia – too much of a good thing?
Published in
Critical Care, October 2014
DOI 10.1186/s13054-014-0556-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hayley Gershengorn

Abstract

While avoiding hypoxemia has long been a goal of critical care practitioners, less attention has been paid to the potential for excessive oxygenation. Interest has mounted recently in understanding the clinical effects of hyperoxemia during critical illness, in particular its impact following cardiac arrest. In this issue of Critical Care, Dell'Anna and colleagues review available animal and human data evaluating the impact of hyperoxemia after cardiac arrest. They conclude that while hyperoxemia during cardiopulmonary resuscitation is probably desirable, it should probably be avoided during post-resuscitation care. These conclusions are in line with two broader themes in contemporary critical care: that less may be more; and that it is time to look beyond simply preventing short-term mortality towards longer-term outcomes.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 31 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 7 23%
Student > Bachelor 5 16%
Student > Postgraduate 3 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 6%
Researcher 2 6%
Other 6 19%
Unknown 6 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 17 55%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 19%
Neuroscience 1 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 3%
Unknown 6 19%