↓ Skip to main content

Medical malpractice, defensive medicine and role of the “media” in Italy

Overview of attention for article published in Multidisciplinary Respiratory Medicine, March 2015
Altmetric Badge

Readers on

mendeley
48 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Medical malpractice, defensive medicine and role of the “media” in Italy
Published in
Multidisciplinary Respiratory Medicine, March 2015
DOI 10.1186/s40248-015-0006-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Domenico M Toraldo, Ughetta Vergari, Marta Toraldo

Abstract

For many years until now, Italy has been subjected to an inconsistent and contradictory media campaign. On one hand the "media" present us with bold and reassuring messages about the progress of medical science; on the other hand they are prone to kneejerk criticism every time medical treatment does not have the desired effect, routinely describing such cases as glaring examples of "malasanità", an Italian word of recent coinage used to denote medical malpractice. Newspaper reports of legal proceedings involving health treatment are frequently full of errors and lack any scientific basis. The published data confirm the unsustainably high number of lawsuits against doctors and medical structures, accompanied by demands for compensation arising from true or alleged medical errors or mistakes blamed on the work of health structures. Currently Italian citizens have a greater awareness of their right to health than in the past, and patients' expectations have risen. A discrepancy is emerging between the current state of medical science and the capacities of individual doctors and health structures. Lastly, there is a need for greater monitoring of the quality of health care services and a greater emphasis on health risk prevention.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 48 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 48 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 8 17%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 10%
Researcher 4 8%
Lecturer 2 4%
Other 7 15%
Unknown 16 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 16 33%
Social Sciences 3 6%
Arts and Humanities 2 4%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 2%
Other 6 13%
Unknown 18 38%