↓ Skip to main content

Effects of varenicline and cognitive bias modification on neural response to smoking-related cues: study protocol for a randomized controlled study

Overview of attention for article published in Trials, October 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
10 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
89 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Effects of varenicline and cognitive bias modification on neural response to smoking-related cues: study protocol for a randomized controlled study
Published in
Trials, October 2014
DOI 10.1186/1745-6215-15-391
Pubmed ID
Authors

Angela S Attwood, Tim Williams, Sally Adams, Francis J McClernon, Marcus R Munafò

Abstract

Smoking-related cues can trigger drug-seeking behaviors, and computer-based interventions that reduce cognitive biases towards such cues may be efficacious and cost-effective cessation aids. In order to optimize such interventions, there needs to be better understanding of the mechanisms underlying the effects of cognitive bias modification (CBM). Here we present a protocol for an investigation of the neural effects of CBM and varenicline in non-quitting daily smokers.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 89 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 1%
Denmark 1 1%
Romania 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Unknown 85 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 16 18%
Student > Master 13 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 12%
Student > Bachelor 9 10%
Other 7 8%
Other 15 17%
Unknown 18 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 26 29%
Medicine and Dentistry 15 17%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 9%
Neuroscience 3 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 3%
Other 12 13%
Unknown 22 25%