↓ Skip to main content

Fusing multiple protein-protein similarity networks to effectively predict lncRNA-protein interactions

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Bioinformatics, October 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (77th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
45 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
30 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Fusing multiple protein-protein similarity networks to effectively predict lncRNA-protein interactions
Published in
BMC Bioinformatics, October 2017
DOI 10.1186/s12859-017-1819-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Xiaoxiong Zheng, Yang Wang, Kai Tian, Jiaogen Zhou, Jihong Guan, Libo Luo, Shuigeng Zhou

Abstract

Long non-coding RNA (lncRNA) plays important roles in many biological and pathological processes, including transcriptional regulation and gene regulation. As lncRNA interacts with multiple proteins, predicting lncRNA-protein interactions (lncRPIs) is an important way to study the functions of lncRNA. Up to now, there have been a few works that exploit protein-protein interactions (PPIs) to help the prediction of new lncRPIs. In this paper, we propose to boost the prediction of lncRPIs by fusing multiple protein-protein similarity networks (PPSNs). Concretely, we first construct four PPSNs based on protein sequences, protein domains, protein GO terms and the STRING database respectively, then build a more informative PPSN by fusing these four constructed PPSNs. Finally, we predict new lncRPIs by a random walk method with the fused PPSN and known lncRPIs. Our experimental results show that the new approach outperforms the existing methods. Fusing multiple protein-protein similarity networks can effectively boost the performance of predicting lncRPIs.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 30 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 30%
Researcher 5 17%
Student > Master 3 10%
Student > Bachelor 2 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 3%
Other 4 13%
Unknown 6 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 27%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 23%
Computer Science 4 13%
Environmental Science 1 3%
Mathematics 1 3%
Other 3 10%
Unknown 6 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 October 2017.
All research outputs
#3,962,598
of 23,005,189 outputs
Outputs from BMC Bioinformatics
#1,491
of 7,312 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#71,779
of 325,925 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Bioinformatics
#26
of 122 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,005,189 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,312 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 325,925 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 122 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.