↓ Skip to main content

Guided Application of Ventricular Catheters (GAVCA) - multicentre study to compare the ventricular catheter position after use of a catheter guide versus freehand application: study protocol for a…

Overview of attention for article published in Trials, December 2013
Altmetric Badge

Readers on

mendeley
57 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Guided Application of Ventricular Catheters (GAVCA) - multicentre study to compare the ventricular catheter position after use of a catheter guide versus freehand application: study protocol for a randomised trail
Published in
Trials, December 2013
DOI 10.1186/1745-6215-14-428
Pubmed ID
Authors

Andreas Schaumann, Ulrich-Wilhelm Thomale

Abstract

The standard technique for the placement of ventricular catheters (VC) comprises a high proportion of malpositioning of the catheter (12.5 to 40%). Technical advances such as neuronavigation or ultrasound have been shown to increase the accuracy of the procedure. Since these means result in significant technical and time consuming efforts, they are used for selected cases only. In order to simplify the controlled placement of ventricular catheters a newly developed smartphone assisted guiding tool has been introduced. In this study the efficacy and safety of this guiding tool is determined.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 57 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 57 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 10 18%
Student > Bachelor 10 18%
Other 9 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 7%
Student > Postgraduate 3 5%
Other 7 12%
Unknown 14 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 26 46%
Neuroscience 6 11%
Psychology 3 5%
Engineering 2 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 2%
Other 2 4%
Unknown 17 30%