↓ Skip to main content

The risk of heart failure associated with the use of noninsulin blood glucose-lowering drugs: systematic review and meta-analysis of published observational studies

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Cardiovascular Disorders, September 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
60 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
102 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The risk of heart failure associated with the use of noninsulin blood glucose-lowering drugs: systematic review and meta-analysis of published observational studies
Published in
BMC Cardiovascular Disorders, September 2014
DOI 10.1186/1471-2261-14-129
Pubmed ID
Authors

Cristina Varas-Lorenzo, Andrea V Margulis, Manel Pladevall, Nuria Riera-Guardia, Brian Calingaert, Lorna Hazell, Silvana Romio, Susana Perez-Gutthann

Abstract

Patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) are at high risk of heart failure. A summary of the effects of blood glucose-lowering drugs other than glitazones on the risk of heart failure in routine clinical practice is lacking. The objective of this study was to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies on the risk of heart failure when using blood glucose-lowering drugs.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 102 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Nigeria 1 <1%
Unknown 100 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 16 16%
Student > Master 12 12%
Other 8 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 8%
Student > Bachelor 7 7%
Other 25 25%
Unknown 26 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 47 46%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 4%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 2%
Other 8 8%
Unknown 31 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 September 2015.
All research outputs
#16,303,638
of 24,787,209 outputs
Outputs from BMC Cardiovascular Disorders
#858
of 1,856 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#145,309
of 258,066 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Cardiovascular Disorders
#20
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,787,209 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,856 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 258,066 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.