You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The effectiveness of sit-stand workstations for changing office workers’ sitting time: results from the Stand@Work randomized controlled trial pilot
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, October 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12966-014-0127-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Josephine Y Chau, Michelle Daley, Scott Dunn, Anu Srinivasan, Anna Do, Adrian E Bauman, Hidde P van der Ploeg |
| Abstract |
Prolonged sitting time is detrimental for health. Individuals with desk-based occupations tend to sit a great deal and sit-stand workstations have been identified as a potential strategy to reduce sitting time. Hence, the objective of the current study was to examine the effects of using sit-stand workstations on office workers' sitting time at work and over the whole day. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 34 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 10 | 29% |
| Australia | 2 | 6% |
| United States | 2 | 6% |
| Netherlands | 2 | 6% |
| Ireland | 2 | 6% |
| Canada | 1 | 3% |
| Nigeria | 1 | 3% |
| Italy | 1 | 3% |
| Brazil | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 11 | 32% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 18 | 53% |
| Scientists | 10 | 29% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 15% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 283 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Austria | 1 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 278 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 50 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 44 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 36 | 13% |
| Researcher | 29 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 17 | 6% |
| Other | 53 | 19% |
| Unknown | 54 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 49 | 17% |
| Sports and Recreations | 46 | 16% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 34 | 12% |
| Psychology | 20 | 7% |
| Engineering | 17 | 6% |
| Other | 52 | 18% |
| Unknown | 65 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 25. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 September 2022.
All research outputs
#1,360,153
of 23,577,761 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
#507
of 1,975 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,978
of 256,866 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
#7
of 38 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,761 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,975 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 28.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 256,866 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 38 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.