↓ Skip to main content

Mammographic breast density refines Tyrer-Cuzick estimates of breast cancer risk in high-risk women: findings from the placebo arm of the International Breast Cancer Intervention Study I

Overview of attention for article published in Breast Cancer Research, October 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
patent
7 patents
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
74 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
61 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Mammographic breast density refines Tyrer-Cuzick estimates of breast cancer risk in high-risk women: findings from the placebo arm of the International Breast Cancer Intervention Study I
Published in
Breast Cancer Research, October 2014
DOI 10.1186/s13058-014-0451-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jane Warwick, Hanna Birke, Jennifer Stone, Ruth ML Warren, Elizabeth Pinney, Adam R Brentnall, Stephen W Duffy, Anthony Howell, Jack Cuzick

Abstract

Mammographic density is well-established as a risk factor for breast cancer, however, adjustment for age and body mass index (BMI) is vital to its clinical interpretation when assessing individual risk. In this paper we develop a model to adjust mammographic density for age and BMI and show how this adjusted mammographic density measure might be used with existing risk prediction models to identify high-risk women more precisely.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 61 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 61 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 10 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 13%
Researcher 5 8%
Student > Bachelor 5 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 7%
Other 14 23%
Unknown 15 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 27 44%
Computer Science 3 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 3%
Other 6 10%
Unknown 19 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 June 2021.
All research outputs
#5,338,260
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Breast Cancer Research
#624
of 2,052 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#56,304
of 267,594 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Breast Cancer Research
#15
of 47 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 78th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,052 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 267,594 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 47 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.