You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Identification of tumor epithelium and stroma in tissue microarrays using texture analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Diagnostic Pathology, March 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1746-1596-7-22 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Nina Linder, Juho Konsti, Riku Turkki, Esa Rahtu, Mikael Lundin, Stig Nordling, Caj Haglund, Timo Ahonen, Matti Pietikäinen, Johan Lundin |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 125 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 3 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 119 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 33 | 26% |
| Researcher | 26 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 18 | 14% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 9 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 6% |
| Other | 10 | 8% |
| Unknown | 21 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Computer Science | 37 | 30% |
| Engineering | 17 | 14% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 13 | 10% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 9 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 6% |
| Other | 12 | 10% |
| Unknown | 30 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 October 2014.
All research outputs
#17,363,471
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Diagnostic Pathology
#559
of 1,212 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#113,291
of 172,638 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Diagnostic Pathology
#9
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,212 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 172,638 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.