↓ Skip to main content

Discriminating imaging findings of acute osteoporotic vertebral fracture: a prospective multicenter cohort study

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, October 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (54th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (58th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
23 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Discriminating imaging findings of acute osteoporotic vertebral fracture: a prospective multicenter cohort study
Published in
Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, October 2014
DOI 10.1186/s13018-014-0096-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Khalid Mohammad Qasem, Akinobu Suzuki, Kentaro Yamada, Masatoshi Hoshino, Tadao Tsujio, Shinji Takahashi, Hiroaki Nakamura

Abstract

Appropriate treatment of osteoporotic vertebral fractures (OVF) requires knowledge of the age of the fracture. Although diagnostic imaging has made remarkable progress in recent years, it remains difficult to differentiate acute fractures from old. Our purpose was to investigate chronological changes in radiological findings after OVF and to identify discriminators of acute versus older injuries.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 23 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 3 13%
Student > Postgraduate 3 13%
Lecturer 2 9%
Other 2 9%
Unspecified 2 9%
Other 5 22%
Unknown 6 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 35%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 9%
Unspecified 2 9%
Neuroscience 2 9%
Engineering 1 4%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 8 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 October 2014.
All research outputs
#12,904,003
of 22,765,347 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
#369
of 1,364 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#115,639
of 255,616 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
#7
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,765,347 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,364 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 255,616 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.