↓ Skip to main content

Immuno-thermal ablations – boosting the anticancer immune response

Overview of attention for article published in Journal for Immunotherapy of Cancer, October 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (79th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
34 X users
patent
4 patents
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
158 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
116 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Immuno-thermal ablations – boosting the anticancer immune response
Published in
Journal for Immunotherapy of Cancer, October 2017
DOI 10.1186/s40425-017-0284-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ryan Slovak, Johannes M. Ludwig, Scott N. Gettinger, Roy S. Herbst, Hyun S. Kim

Abstract

The use of immunomodulation to treat malignancies has seen a recent explosion in interest. The therapeutic appeal of these treatments is far reaching, and many new applications continue to evolve. In particular, immune modulating drugs have the potential to enhance the systemic anticancer immune effects induced by locoregional thermal ablation. The immune responses induced by ablation monotherapy are well documented, but independently they tend to be incapable of evoking a robust antitumor response. By adding immunomodulators to traditional ablative techniques, several researchers have sought to amplify the induced immune response and trigger systemic antitumor activity. This paper summarizes the work done in animal models to investigate the immune effects induced by the combination of ablative therapy and immunomodulation. Combination therapy with radiofrequency ablation, cryoablation, and microwave ablation are all reviewed, and special attention has been paid to the addition of checkpoint blockades.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 34 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 116 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 116 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 24 21%
Other 12 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 9%
Student > Postgraduate 9 8%
Other 20 17%
Unknown 31 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 43 37%
Engineering 8 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 3%
Chemistry 4 3%
Other 10 9%
Unknown 41 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 39. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 September 2023.
All research outputs
#1,060,798
of 25,468,708 outputs
Outputs from Journal for Immunotherapy of Cancer
#244
of 3,439 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,798
of 336,214 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal for Immunotherapy of Cancer
#6
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,468,708 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,439 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 336,214 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.