You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Women’s experiences of two different self-assessment methods for monitoring fetal movements in full-term pregnancy - a crossover trial
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, October 2014
|
DOI | 10.1186/1471-2393-14-349 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Mari-Cristin Malm, Ingela Rådestad, Christine Rubertsson, Ingegerd Hildingsson, Helena Lindgren |
Abstract |
Low maternal awareness of fetal movements is associated with negative birth outcomes. Knowledge regarding pregnant women's compliance with programs of systematic self-assessment of fetal movements is needed. The aim of this study was to investigate women's experiences using two different self-assessment methods for monitoring fetal movements and to determine if the women had a preference for one or the other method. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Poland | 1 | 50% |
Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 51 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
Italy | 1 | 2% |
Australia | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 48 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 9 | 18% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 10% |
Student > Bachelor | 4 | 8% |
Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 6% |
Researcher | 3 | 6% |
Other | 7 | 14% |
Unknown | 20 | 39% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 10 | 20% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 14% |
Psychology | 5 | 10% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 4% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 4% |
Other | 5 | 10% |
Unknown | 20 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 January 2016.
All research outputs
#15,557,505
of 23,881,329 outputs
Outputs from BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
#2,976
of 4,379 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#143,998
of 257,342 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
#63
of 87 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,881,329 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,379 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.0. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 257,342 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 87 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.