↓ Skip to main content

Psychological characteristics of Japanese patients with chronic pain assessed by the Rorschach test

Overview of attention for article published in BioPsychoSocial Medicine, November 2010
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
55 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Psychological characteristics of Japanese patients with chronic pain assessed by the Rorschach test
Published in
BioPsychoSocial Medicine, November 2010
DOI 10.1186/1751-0759-4-20
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kazumi Yamamoto, Kenji Kanbara, Hiromi Mutsuura, Ikumi Ban, Yasuyuki Mizuno, Tetsuya Abe, Maki Yoshino, Aran Tajika, Yoshihide Nakai, Mikihiko Fukunaga

Abstract

The increasing number of patients with chronic pain in Japan has become a major issue in terms of the patient's quality of life, medical costs, and related social problems. Pain is a multi-dimensional experience with physiological, affective, cognitive, behavioral and social components, and recommended to be managed via a combination of bio-psycho-social aspects. However, a biomedical approach is still the dominant method of pain treatment in Japan. The current study aimed to evaluate comprehensive psychological functions and processes in Japanese chronic pain patients.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 55 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 2 4%
Unknown 53 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 14 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 18%
Student > Master 10 18%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 7%
Student > Postgraduate 3 5%
Other 8 15%
Unknown 6 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 30 55%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 11%
Arts and Humanities 2 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 2%
Other 6 11%
Unknown 8 15%