↓ Skip to main content

A proposed framework for developing quality assessment tools

Overview of attention for article published in Systematic Reviews, October 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
82 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Readers on

mendeley
149 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A proposed framework for developing quality assessment tools
Published in
Systematic Reviews, October 2017
DOI 10.1186/s13643-017-0604-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Penny Whiting, Robert Wolff, Susan Mallett, Iveta Simera, Jelena Savović

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 82 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 149 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 149 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 24 16%
Student > Master 23 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 7%
Student > Postgraduate 9 6%
Other 22 15%
Unknown 47 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 22 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 22 15%
Psychology 13 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 5%
Engineering 7 5%
Other 26 17%
Unknown 51 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 55. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 September 2021.
All research outputs
#792,017
of 25,806,763 outputs
Outputs from Systematic Reviews
#100
of 2,257 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,333
of 337,154 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Systematic Reviews
#4
of 42 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,806,763 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,257 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 337,154 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 42 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.