↓ Skip to main content

The Fear Reduction Exercised Early (FREE) approach to low back pain: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial

Overview of attention for article published in Trials, October 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
14 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
201 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The Fear Reduction Exercised Early (FREE) approach to low back pain: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
Published in
Trials, October 2017
DOI 10.1186/s13063-017-2225-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ben Darlow, James Stanley, Sarah Dean, J. Haxby Abbott, Sue Garrett, Fiona Mathieson, Anthony Dowell

Abstract

Low back pain (LBP) is a major health issue associated with considerable health loss and societal costs. General practitioners (GPs) play an important role in the management of LBP; however, GP care has not been shown to be the most cost-effective approach unless exercise and behavioural counselling are added to usual care. The Fear Reduction Exercised Early (FREE) approach to LBP has been developed to assist GPs to manage LBP by empowering exploration and management of psychosocial barriers to recovery and provision of evidence-based care and information. The aim of the Low Back Pain in General Practice (LBPinGP) trial is to explore whether patients with LBP who receive care from GPs trained in the FREE approach have better outcomes than those who receive usual care. This is a cluster randomised controlled superiority trial comparing the FREE approach with usual care for LBP management with investigator-blinded assessment of outcomes. GPs will be recruited and then cluster randomised (in practice groups) to the intervention or control arm. Intervention arm GPs will receive training in the FREE approach, and control arm GPs will continue to practice as usual. Patients presenting to their GP with a primary complaint of LBP will be allocated on the basis of allocation of the GP they consult. We aim to recruit 60 GPs and 275 patients (assuming patients are recruited from 75% of GPs and an average of 5 patients per GP complete the study, accounting for 20% patient participant dropout). Patient participants and the trial statistician will be blind to group allocation throughout the study. Analyses will be undertaken on an intention-to-treat basis. The primary outcome will be back-related functional impairment 6 months post-initial LBP consultation (interim data at 2 weeks, 6 weeks and 3 months), measured with the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire. Secondary patient outcomes include pain, satisfaction, quality of life, days off from work and costs of care. Secondary GP outcomes include beliefs about pain and impairment, GP confidence, and actual and reported clinical behaviour. Health economic and process evaluations will be conducted. In the LBPinGP trial, we will investigate providing an intervention during the first interaction a person with back pain has with their GP. Because the FREE approach is used within a normal GP consultation, if effective, it may be a cost-effective means of improving LBP care. Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry, ACTRN12616000888460 . Registered on 6 July 2016.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 201 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 201 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 27 13%
Student > Master 26 13%
Researcher 18 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 14 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 6%
Other 27 13%
Unknown 76 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 42 21%
Medicine and Dentistry 27 13%
Sports and Recreations 9 4%
Social Sciences 8 4%
Psychology 8 4%
Other 22 11%
Unknown 85 42%