↓ Skip to main content

Income-related inequalities in preventive and curative dental care use among working-age Japanese adults in urban areas: a cross-sectional study

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Oral Health, September 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
65 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Income-related inequalities in preventive and curative dental care use among working-age Japanese adults in urban areas: a cross-sectional study
Published in
BMC Oral Health, September 2014
DOI 10.1186/1472-6831-14-117
Pubmed ID
Authors

Keiko Murakami, Jun Aida, Takayoshi Ohkubo, Hideki Hashimoto

Abstract

Preventive dental care use remains relatively low in Japan, especially among working-age adults. Universal health insurance in Japan covers curative dental care with an out-of-pocket payment limit, though its coverage of preventive dental care is limited. The aim of this study was to test the hypothesis that income inequality in dental care use is found in preventive, but not curative dental care among working-age Japanese adults.

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 65 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
Unknown 64 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 15 23%
Researcher 7 11%
Other 4 6%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 6%
Student > Bachelor 4 6%
Other 14 22%
Unknown 17 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 25 38%
Social Sciences 3 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 3%
Other 7 11%
Unknown 22 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 October 2014.
All research outputs
#15,306,972
of 22,765,347 outputs
Outputs from BMC Oral Health
#738
of 1,461 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#144,900
of 250,219 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Oral Health
#8
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,765,347 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,461 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 250,219 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.