↓ Skip to main content

Experiences of midwives on pharmacological and non-pharmacological labour pain management in Ghana

Overview of attention for article published in Reproductive Health, October 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
237 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Experiences of midwives on pharmacological and non-pharmacological labour pain management in Ghana
Published in
Reproductive Health, October 2017
DOI 10.1186/s12978-017-0398-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lydia Aziato, Abigail A. Kyei, Godsway Deku

Abstract

Due to the debilitating effects of severe labour pains, labour pain management continues to be an important subject that requires much attention. Thus, this study sought to gain a detailed insight into the experiences of midwives on pharmacological and non-pharmacological labour pain management strategies in a resource limited clinical context. A descriptive exploratory qualitative design was adopted for this study which allowed in-depth follow-up of the midwives' comments resulting in a full understanding of emerging findings. Face-to-face individual interviews were conducted, transcribed and data were analysed using content analysis procedures. Verbatim quotes were used to support the findings. Midwives employed different pain control measures including pharmacological and non-pharmacological methods such as psychological care, sacral massage and deep breathing exercises. Doctors prescribed analgesics most of the time while in some cases, the midwives independently administered the drugs. They assisted women who had epidural anaesthesia given by anaesthetists. The midwives did not administer adequate analgesics because of fear of side effects of analgesics. Although the midwives exhibited knowledge on drugs used for labour pain management, they did not regularly administer analgesics and non-pharmacological care provided were inadequate due to increased workload. Some of the midwives showed empathy towards women and supported the women. Most of the midwives perceived labour pain as normal and encouraged women to bear pain. Midwives require regular education on labour pain management and they should pay attention to women in labour individually and administer the care that meets their need.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 237 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 237 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 39 16%
Student > Bachelor 37 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 6%
Other 11 5%
Student > Postgraduate 10 4%
Other 30 13%
Unknown 96 41%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 77 32%
Medicine and Dentistry 29 12%
Social Sciences 8 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 1%
Engineering 3 1%
Other 16 7%
Unknown 101 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 July 2018.
All research outputs
#20,450,513
of 23,006,268 outputs
Outputs from Reproductive Health
#1,330
of 1,423 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#284,211
of 325,925 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Reproductive Health
#35
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,006,268 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,423 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.1. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 325,925 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.