↓ Skip to main content

Strengthening Nepal’s Female Community Health Volunteer network: a qualitative study of experiences at two years

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Health Services Research, October 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
policy
1 policy source
twitter
7 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
118 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Strengthening Nepal’s Female Community Health Volunteer network: a qualitative study of experiences at two years
Published in
BMC Health Services Research, October 2014
DOI 10.1186/1472-6963-14-473
Pubmed ID
Authors

Dan Schwarz, Ranju Sharma, Chhitij Bashyal, Ryan Schwarz, Ashma Baruwal, Gregory Karelas, Bibhusan Basnet, Nirajan Khadka, Jesse Brady, Zach Silver, Joia Mukherjee, Jason Andrews, Duncan Smith-Rohrberg Maru

Abstract

Nepal's Female Community Health Volunteer (FCHV) program has been described as an exemplary public-sector community health worker program. However, despite its merits, the program still struggles to provide high-quality, accessible services nation-wide. Both in Nepal and globally, best practices for community health worker program implementation are not yet known: there is a dearth of empiric research, and the research that has been done has shown inconsistent results.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 118 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
South Africa 1 <1%
Unknown 117 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 30 25%
Researcher 23 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 8%
Lecturer 6 5%
Other 17 14%
Unknown 21 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 28 24%
Medicine and Dentistry 24 20%
Social Sciences 16 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 6%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 3%
Other 16 14%
Unknown 24 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 30. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 December 2016.
All research outputs
#1,234,377
of 24,216,270 outputs
Outputs from BMC Health Services Research
#361
of 8,145 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,034
of 259,922 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Health Services Research
#13
of 161 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,216,270 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,145 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 259,922 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 161 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.