You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Effect of holding equine oocytes in meiosis inhibitor-free medium before in vitro maturation and of holding temperature on meiotic suppression and mitochondrial energy/redox potential
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology, October 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1477-7827-12-99 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Nicola A Martino, Maria E Dell’Aquila, Manuel Filioli Uranio, Lucia Rutigliano, Michele Nicassio, Giovanni M Lacalandra, Katrin Hinrichs |
| Abstract |
Evaluation of mitochondria function offers an alternative to evaluate embryo development for assessment of oocyte viability, but little information is available on the relationship between mitochondria and chromatin status in equine oocytes. We evaluated these parameters in immature equine oocytes either fixed immediately (IMM) or held overnight in an Earle's/Hank's' M199-based medium in the absence of meiotic inhibitors (EH treatment), and in mature oocytes. We hypothesized that EH holding may affect mitochondria function and that holding temperature may affect the efficiency of meiotic suppression. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 38 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 38 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 8 | 21% |
| Researcher | 5 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 13% |
| Professor | 3 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 8% |
| Other | 7 | 18% |
| Unknown | 7 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 12 | 32% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 12 | 32% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 13% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 5% |
| Unknown | 7 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 October 2014.
All research outputs
#22,759,802
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology
#999
of 1,134 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#229,922
of 269,032 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology
#15
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,134 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.8. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 269,032 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.