↓ Skip to main content

T-tubule biogenesis and triad formation in skeletal muscle and implication in human diseases

Overview of attention for article published in Skeletal Muscle, July 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
148 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
247 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
T-tubule biogenesis and triad formation in skeletal muscle and implication in human diseases
Published in
Skeletal Muscle, July 2011
DOI 10.1186/2044-5040-1-26
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lama Al-Qusairi, Jocelyn Laporte

Abstract

In skeletal muscle, the excitation-contraction (EC) coupling machinery mediates the translation of the action potential transmitted by the nerve into intracellular calcium release and muscle contraction. EC coupling requires a highly specialized membranous structure, the triad, composed of a central T-tubule surrounded by two terminal cisternae from the sarcoplasmic reticulum. While several proteins located on these structures have been identified, mechanisms governing T-tubule biogenesis and triad formation remain largely unknown. Here, we provide a description of triad structure and plasticity and review the role of proteins that have been linked to T-tubule biogenesis and triad formation and/or maintenance specifically in skeletal muscle: caveolin 3, amphiphysin 2, dysferlin, mitsugumins, junctophilins, myotubularin, ryanodine receptor, and dihydhropyridine Receptor. The importance of these proteins in triad biogenesis and subsequently in muscle contraction is sustained by studies on animal models and by the direct implication of most of these proteins in human myopathies.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 247 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 2 <1%
United States 2 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 237 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 54 22%
Student > Bachelor 33 13%
Student > Master 30 12%
Researcher 24 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 12 5%
Other 37 15%
Unknown 57 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 66 27%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 54 22%
Medicine and Dentistry 32 13%
Neuroscience 9 4%
Engineering 4 2%
Other 19 8%
Unknown 63 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 April 2019.
All research outputs
#16,048,009
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Skeletal Muscle
#325
of 388 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#88,997
of 128,350 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Skeletal Muscle
#4
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 388 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 128,350 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.