You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Genome of the house fly, Musca domestica L., a global vector of diseases with adaptations to a septic environment
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Genome Biology, October 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13059-014-0466-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jeffrey G Scott, Wesley C Warren, Leo W Beukeboom, Daniel Bopp, Andrew G Clark, Sarah D Giers, Monika Hediger, Andrew K Jones, Shinji Kasai, Cheryl A Leichter, Ming Li, Richard P Meisel, Patrick Minx, Terence D Murphy, David R Nelson, William R Reid, Frank D Rinkevich, Hugh M Robertson, Timothy B Sackton, David B Sattelle, Francoise Thibaud-Nissen, Chad Tomlinson, Louis van de Zande, Kimberly KO Walden, Richard K Wilson, Nannan Liu |
| Abstract |
Adult house flies, Musca domestica L., are mechanical vectors of more than 100 devastating diseases that have severe consequences for human and animal health. House fly larvae play a vital role as decomposers of animal wastes, and thus live in intimate association with many animal pathogens. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 44 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 10 | 23% |
| United States | 6 | 14% |
| France | 2 | 5% |
| Ghana | 1 | 2% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 2% |
| Finland | 1 | 2% |
| India | 1 | 2% |
| Syrian Arab Republic | 1 | 2% |
| Argentina | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 7% |
| Unknown | 17 | 39% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 22 | 50% |
| Scientists | 19 | 43% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 5% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 248 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 1% |
| Portugal | 2 | <1% |
| Brazil | 2 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Chile | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Taiwan | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 234 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 48 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 46 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 30 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 30 | 12% |
| Professor | 9 | 4% |
| Other | 31 | 13% |
| Unknown | 54 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 104 | 42% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 51 | 21% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 3% |
| Chemistry | 5 | 2% |
| Environmental Science | 5 | 2% |
| Other | 18 | 7% |
| Unknown | 58 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 226. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 January 2022.
All research outputs
#172,772
of 25,795,662 outputs
Outputs from Genome Biology
#45
of 4,517 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,510
of 269,089 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genome Biology
#1
of 97 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,795,662 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,517 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 269,089 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 97 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.