You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Evaluation of an inter-professional training program for student clinical supervision in Australia
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Human Resources for Health, October 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1478-4491-12-60 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sue Gillieatt, Robyn Martin, Trudi Marchant, Angela Fielding, Kate Duncanson |
| Abstract |
As a response to an Australian shortage of clinical health, nursing, and medical placements, Commonwealth Government funding has been directed to expand student training opportunities and increase the competence and number of available clinical supervisors. This paper evaluates the application of a particular supervision training model for this purpose. It considers the model's suitability and relevance across professions and its impact on supervisory knowledge, skills, and values as well as the intention to supervise students. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Colombia | 1 | 17% |
| Rwanda | 1 | 17% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 3 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 33% |
| Members of the public | 2 | 33% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 17% |
| Scientists | 1 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 101 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Indonesia | 1 | <1% |
| Singapore | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 98 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 17 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 9% |
| Researcher | 8 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 6 | 6% |
| Other | 24 | 24% |
| Unknown | 26 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 21 | 21% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 19 | 19% |
| Psychology | 10 | 10% |
| Social Sciences | 8 | 8% |
| Computer Science | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 9 | 9% |
| Unknown | 31 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 October 2014.
All research outputs
#8,261,756
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Human Resources for Health
#827
of 1,261 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#85,368
of 268,208 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Human Resources for Health
#11
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,261 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.3. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 268,208 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.