↓ Skip to main content

Knowledge of Nairobi East District Community Health Workers concerning HIV-related orofacial lesions and other common oral lesions

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, October 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (55th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
68 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Knowledge of Nairobi East District Community Health Workers concerning HIV-related orofacial lesions and other common oral lesions
Published in
BMC Public Health, October 2014
DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-14-1066
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lucina N Koyio, Wil JM van der Sanden, Elizabeth O Dimba, Jan Mulder, Andre JAM van der Ven, Matthias AW Merkx, Jo E Frencken

Abstract

Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) related orofacial lesions (HROLs) impact negatively on the health of patients and could be managed at primary healthcare (PHC) level. Community health workers (CHWs) are crucial in optimal patient management through patient identification, education and early referral for professional care. The study objective was to assess knowledge of Nairobi East district CHWs regarding HROLs and other common oral diseases.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 68 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
South Africa 2 3%
Indonesia 1 1%
Unknown 65 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 10 15%
Student > Master 9 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 9%
Student > Bachelor 4 6%
Other 16 24%
Unknown 15 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 17 25%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 18%
Social Sciences 8 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 4%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 3%
Other 7 10%
Unknown 19 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 October 2014.
All research outputs
#12,786,886
of 22,766,595 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#8,803
of 14,839 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#114,664
of 256,089 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#160
of 289 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,766,595 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,839 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 256,089 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 289 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.