You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Knowledge of Nairobi East District Community Health Workers concerning HIV-related orofacial lesions and other common oral lesions
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Public Health, October 2014
|
DOI | 10.1186/1471-2458-14-1066 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Lucina N Koyio, Wil JM van der Sanden, Elizabeth O Dimba, Jan Mulder, Andre JAM van der Ven, Matthias AW Merkx, Jo E Frencken |
Abstract |
Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) related orofacial lesions (HROLs) impact negatively on the health of patients and could be managed at primary healthcare (PHC) level. Community health workers (CHWs) are crucial in optimal patient management through patient identification, education and early referral for professional care. The study objective was to assess knowledge of Nairobi East district CHWs regarding HROLs and other common oral diseases. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 2 | 40% |
Unknown | 3 | 60% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 4 | 80% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 68 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
South Africa | 2 | 3% |
Indonesia | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 65 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 10 | 15% |
Student > Master | 9 | 13% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 12% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 9% |
Student > Bachelor | 4 | 6% |
Other | 16 | 24% |
Unknown | 15 | 22% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 17 | 25% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 12 | 18% |
Social Sciences | 8 | 12% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 4% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 3% |
Other | 7 | 10% |
Unknown | 19 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 October 2014.
All research outputs
#12,786,886
of 22,766,595 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#8,803
of 14,839 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#114,664
of 256,089 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#160
of 289 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,766,595 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,839 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 256,089 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 289 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.