↓ Skip to main content

Placement matching of alcohol-dependent patients based on a standardized intake assessment: rationale and design of a randomized controlled trial

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Psychiatry, October 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
54 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Placement matching of alcohol-dependent patients based on a standardized intake assessment: rationale and design of a randomized controlled trial
Published in
BMC Psychiatry, October 2014
DOI 10.1186/s12888-014-0286-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Angela Buchholz, Anke Friedrichs, Michael Berner, Hans-Helmut König, Alexander Konnopka, Ludwig Kraus, Levente Kriston, Heinrich Küfner, Daniela Piontek, Fred Rist, Jeanette Röhrig

Abstract

Despite considerable research on substance-abuse placement matching, evidence is still inconclusive. The aims of this exploratory trial are to evaluate (a) the effects of following matching guidelines on health-care costs and heavy drinking, and (b) factors affecting the implementation of matching guidelines in the treatment of alcohol-dependent patients.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 54 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
Unknown 53 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 15 28%
Student > Master 7 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 9%
Student > Bachelor 4 7%
Student > Postgraduate 4 7%
Other 9 17%
Unknown 10 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 14 26%
Medicine and Dentistry 11 20%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 13%
Social Sciences 4 7%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 3 6%
Other 2 4%
Unknown 13 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 May 2015.
All research outputs
#17,728,987
of 22,766,595 outputs
Outputs from BMC Psychiatry
#3,660
of 4,673 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#172,246
of 255,842 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Psychiatry
#59
of 81 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,766,595 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,673 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.8. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 255,842 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 81 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.