↓ Skip to main content

A combination strategy for enhancing linkage to and retention in HIV care among adults newly diagnosed with HIV in Mozambique: study protocol for a site-randomized implementation science study

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Infectious Diseases, October 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
28 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
197 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A combination strategy for enhancing linkage to and retention in HIV care among adults newly diagnosed with HIV in Mozambique: study protocol for a site-randomized implementation science study
Published in
BMC Infectious Diseases, October 2014
DOI 10.1186/s12879-014-0549-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Batya Elul, Maria Lahuerta, Fatima Abacassamo, Matthew R Lamb, Laurence Ahoua, Margaret L McNairy, Maria Tomo, Deborah Horowitz, Roberta Sutton, Antonio Mussa, Danielle Gurr, Ilesh Jani

Abstract

Despite the extraordinary scale up of HIV prevention, care and treatment services in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) over the past decade, the overall effectiveness of HIV programs has been significantly hindered by high levels of attrition across the HIV care continuum. Data from "real-life" settings are needed on the effectiveness of an easy to deliver package of services that can improve overall performance of the HIV care continuum.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 197 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 1%
United States 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 192 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 42 21%
Researcher 41 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 12%
Other 12 6%
Student > Postgraduate 11 6%
Other 31 16%
Unknown 36 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 58 29%
Nursing and Health Professions 26 13%
Social Sciences 25 13%
Psychology 5 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 3%
Other 33 17%
Unknown 45 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 November 2014.
All research outputs
#14,202,176
of 22,766,595 outputs
Outputs from BMC Infectious Diseases
#3,767
of 7,667 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#132,545
of 255,778 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Infectious Diseases
#86
of 180 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,766,595 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,667 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.6. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 255,778 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 180 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.