You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Development of family and dietary habits questionnaires: the assessment of family processes, dietary habits and adolescents’ impulsiveness in Norwegian adolescents and their parents
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, October 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12966-014-0130-z |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Mona Bjelland, Solveig ES Hausken, Ester FC Sleddens, Lene F Andersen, Hanne C Lie, Arnstein Finset, Lea Maes, Elisabeth L Melbye, Kari Glavin, Merete W Hanssen-Bauer, Nanna Lien |
| Abstract |
There is a need for valid and comprehensive measures of parental influence on children's energy balance-related behaviours (EBRB). Such measures should be based on a theoretical framework, acknowledging the dynamic and complex nature of interactions occurring within a family. The aim of the Family & Dietary habits (F&D) project was to develop a conceptual framework identifying important and changeable family processes influencing dietary behaviours of 13-15 year olds. A second aim was to develop valid and reliable questionnaires for adolescents and their parents (both mothers and fathers) measuring these processes. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 3 | 50% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 33% |
| United States | 1 | 17% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 50% |
| Scientists | 2 | 33% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 177 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 177 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 30 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 29 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 23 | 13% |
| Researcher | 11 | 6% |
| Other | 11 | 6% |
| Other | 33 | 19% |
| Unknown | 40 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 33 | 19% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 29 | 16% |
| Psychology | 22 | 12% |
| Social Sciences | 14 | 8% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 10 | 6% |
| Other | 22 | 12% |
| Unknown | 47 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 December 2016.
All research outputs
#7,136,239
of 22,766,595 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
#1,550
of 1,926 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#78,646
of 255,778 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
#32
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,766,595 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,926 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 28.4. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 255,778 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.