↓ Skip to main content

Participants’ perceptions and understanding of a malaria clinical trial in Bangladesh

Overview of attention for article published in Malaria Journal, June 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
57 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Participants’ perceptions and understanding of a malaria clinical trial in Bangladesh
Published in
Malaria Journal, June 2014
DOI 10.1186/1475-2875-13-217
Pubmed ID
Authors

Debashish Das, Phaik Yeong Cheah, Fateha Akter, Dulal Paul, Akhterul Islam, Abdullah A Sayeed, Rasheda Samad, Ridwanur Rahman, Amir Hossain, Arjen Dondorp, Nicholas P Day, Nicholas J White, Mahtabuddin Hasan, Aniruddha Ghose, Elizabeth A Ashley, Abul Faiz

Abstract

Existing evidence suggests that there is often limited understanding among participants in clinical trials about the informed consent process, resulting in their providing consent without really understanding the purpose of the study, specific procedures, and their rights. The objective of the study was to determine the subjects' understanding of research, perceptions of voluntariness and motivations for participation in a malaria clinical trial.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 57 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 4%
United States 1 2%
Unknown 54 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 19%
Researcher 10 18%
Student > Master 8 14%
Student > Bachelor 4 7%
Other 3 5%
Other 8 14%
Unknown 13 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 23 40%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 11%
Social Sciences 3 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 4%
Other 6 11%
Unknown 15 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 October 2014.
All research outputs
#15,307,723
of 22,766,595 outputs
Outputs from Malaria Journal
#4,465
of 5,554 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#133,265
of 228,081 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Malaria Journal
#67
of 102 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,766,595 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,554 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 228,081 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 102 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.