↓ Skip to main content

Pre-clinical studies of bone regeneration with human bone marrow stromal cells and biphasic calcium phosphate

Overview of attention for article published in Stem Cell Research & Therapy, October 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#3 of 2,415)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
38 news outlets
twitter
1 X user
patent
2 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
98 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
95 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Pre-clinical studies of bone regeneration with human bone marrow stromal cells and biphasic calcium phosphate
Published in
Stem Cell Research & Therapy, October 2014
DOI 10.1186/scrt504
Pubmed ID
Authors

Meadhbh Á Brennan, Audrey Renaud, Jérôme Amiaud, Markus T Rojewski, Hubert Schrezenmeier, Dominique Heymann, Valerie Trichet, Pierre Layrolle

Abstract

Repair of large bone defects remains a significant clinical challenge. Bone marrow stromal cells (BMSCs), a subset of which is known as bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells, show therapeutic potential for bone regeneration. However, their isolation, expansion and implantation will need to be conducted under good manufacturing practices (GMP) at separate locations. An investigation which mimics this clinical scenario where large bone defects shall be regenerated is required before clinical trials can be initiated.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 95 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
Unknown 94 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 23%
Researcher 15 16%
Student > Master 9 9%
Student > Bachelor 8 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 4%
Other 11 12%
Unknown 26 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 13 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 11 12%
Engineering 8 8%
Materials Science 4 4%
Other 10 11%
Unknown 37 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 306. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 August 2020.
All research outputs
#91,909
of 22,766,595 outputs
Outputs from Stem Cell Research & Therapy
#3
of 2,415 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#878
of 255,754 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Stem Cell Research & Therapy
#2
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,766,595 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,415 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 255,754 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.