↓ Skip to main content

Clinicopathological evaluation of anoxic mucosal injury in strangulation ileus

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Surgery, October 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
15 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Clinicopathological evaluation of anoxic mucosal injury in strangulation ileus
Published in
BMC Surgery, October 2014
DOI 10.1186/1471-2482-14-79
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ryuji Takahashi, Yoshito Akagi, Takaho Tanaka, Atsushi Kaibara, Sugako Kajiwara, Ichirou Shima, Jun Taguchi, Tomoaki Mizobe, Tatsuyuki Kakuma, Kazuo Shirouzu

Abstract

In patients with strangulation ileus, the severity of bowel ischemia is unpredictable before surgery. To consider a grading scale of anoxic damage, we evaluated the pathological findings and investigated predictive factors for bowel gangrene.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 7%
Unknown 14 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Librarian 2 13%
Other 2 13%
Student > Bachelor 2 13%
Researcher 2 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 13%
Other 4 27%
Unknown 1 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 9 60%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 7%
Engineering 1 7%
Unknown 3 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 October 2014.
All research outputs
#18,380,628
of 22,766,595 outputs
Outputs from BMC Surgery
#617
of 1,319 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#182,633
of 255,780 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Surgery
#13
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,766,595 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,319 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.8. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 255,780 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.