You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Comparing early years and childhood experiences and outcomes in Scotland, England and three city-regions: a plausible explanation for Scottish ‘excess’ mortality?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Pediatrics, October 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2431-14-259 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Martin Taulbut, David Walsh, John O’Dowd |
| Abstract |
Negative early years and childhood experiences (EYCE), including socio-economic circumstances, parental health and parenting style, are associated with poor health outcomes both in childhood and adulthood. It has also been proposed that EYCE were historically worse in Scottish areas, especially Glasgow and the Clyde Valley, compared to elsewhere in the UK and that this variation can provide a partial explanation for the excess of ill health and mortality observed among those Scottish populations. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 71 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| Mexico | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 69 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 10 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 13% |
| Researcher | 6 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 12 | 17% |
| Unknown | 20 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 16 | 23% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 13 | 18% |
| Social Sciences | 9 | 13% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 7% |
| Sports and Recreations | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 3 | 4% |
| Unknown | 24 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 November 2014.
All research outputs
#19,181,276
of 23,770,218 outputs
Outputs from BMC Pediatrics
#2,454
of 3,152 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#185,137
of 257,282 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Pediatrics
#41
of 59 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,770,218 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,152 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 257,282 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 59 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.